<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Little Generics Suggestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/</link>
	<description>Information, Views and News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.dabarobjects.com/?p=5#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I personally have an issue with both Generics AND Annotations in Java: And combined they have the potential to create one hell of a mess.

Nevertheless, you're solution certainly has merit...but it's really just a workaround for the fact that type info isn't reified in Generics under Java.  If that were the case you wouldn't have to go through this at all.

A far better solution would be for Sun (or whomever) to implement reification, thereby giving you the flexibility that Generics were meant to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally have an issue with both Generics AND Annotations in Java: And combined they have the potential to create one hell of a mess.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, you&#8217;re solution certainly has merit&#8230;but it&#8217;s really just a workaround for the fact that type info isn&#8217;t reified in Generics under Java.  If that were the case you wouldn&#8217;t have to go through this at all.</p>
<p>A far better solution would be for Sun (or whomever) to implement reification, thereby giving you the flexibility that Generics were meant to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dabar</title>
		<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>dabar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.dabarobjects.com/?p=5#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Guice is a framework. Java is a Language, Generics is a Java Language Feature. I am talking about what we will be able to do in core Java without relying on Guice. Meanwhile I prefer Spring to Guice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guice is a framework. Java is a Language, Generics is a Java Language Feature. I am talking about what we will be able to do in core Java without relying on Guice. Meanwhile I prefer Spring to Guice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sakuraba</title>
		<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Sakuraba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.dabarobjects.com/?p=5#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Uhum, did you ever had a chance to look at the Guice framework? This provide you that kind of injection facilities. Besides, if you dont understand Generics completely, just have a look at frameworks that use it extensively and successfully at the same time (just like Guice).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhum, did you ever had a chance to look at the Guice framework? This provide you that kind of injection facilities. Besides, if you dont understand Generics completely, just have a look at frameworks that use it extensively and successfully at the same time (just like Guice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prashant</title>
		<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>prashant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.dabarobjects.com/?p=5#comment-5</guid>
		<description>nice thought...

Thanks
Prashant Jalasutram
http://prashantjalasutram.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice thought&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Prashant Jalasutram<br />
<a href="http://prashantjalasutram.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://prashantjalasutram.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DabarObjects - Models and Perspectives &#187; Views and Suggestion to Java Generics</title>
		<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>DabarObjects - Models and Perspectives &#187; Views and Suggestion to Java Generics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.dabarobjects.com/?p=5#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] This is our own view of the Java Generics and how maybe it can be better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is our own view of the Java Generics and how maybe it can be better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Octavian Nita</title>
		<link>http://info.dabarobjects.com/2008/06/03/some-little-generics-suggestion/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Octavian Nita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.dabarobjects.com/?p=5#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Wow! Nice idea...

I've been struggling to understand/make best of the Java Generics feature for some time now and I still have mixed feelings about it (although I tend to think more often that they are a good thing with not so good implementation).

However, what you are describing here may pertain to a 'more general' issue, closely related to code generation based on annotations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Nice idea&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been struggling to understand/make best of the Java Generics feature for some time now and I still have mixed feelings about it (although I tend to think more often that they are a good thing with not so good implementation).</p>
<p>However, what you are describing here may pertain to a &#8216;more general&#8217; issue, closely related to code generation based on annotations&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
